forum.wfido.ru  

Вернуться   forum.wfido.ru > Прочие эхи > RU.AVIATION

Ответ
 
Опции темы Опции просмотра
  #1  
Старый 02.08.2018, 00:03
Boris Paleev
Guest
 
Сообщений: n/a
По умолчанию USA Military Watch: F-22 Raptor может летать менее одного раза в недел

Boris Paleev написал(а) к All в Aug 18 22:45:44 по местному времени:

Нello All!

https://aftershock.news/?q=node/669667

USA Military Watch: F-22 Raptor может летать менее одного раза в неделю

ср, 01/08/2018 - 18:57 | skif-99 (2 года 8 месяцев)


Raptor стоит слишком много, чтобы летать! Более $60,000 в час, который сделал его самым дорогим истребителем в мире со значительным отрывом. Второй вопрос заключался в том, что самолет сможет летать даже реже, чем и без того высокотехнологичный F-15E Strike Eagle. Время обслуживания, даёт ему скорость вылетов менее одного раза в неделю и, таким образом, серьезно ограничивая его практическую полезность в крупной войне. В то время как Raptor был чрезвычайно сложным, и остается, возможно, самым передовым истребителем в эксплуатации в любой точке мира сегодня, это произошло со значительными затратами - в первую очередь, не в приобретении или проектировании истребителя, а в поддержании и обслуживании его.

Поддержание и обслуживание стало Ахиллесовой пятой Raptor, не только в ограничении боевого потенциала и численности, но и в подрыве жизнеспособности всей программы. Поскольку ВВС США изначально планировали приобрести 750 Raptor-ов, стоимость содержания такого количества истребителей в течение их предполагаемой 55-летней жизни была бы феноменальной. В то время как стоимость планера F-22 составляет приблизительно $150 млн., стоимость эксплуатации истребителя в течение 40 лет жизни составляет приблизительно $550 млн. - возможно, гораздо больше, поскольку с возрастом и расходы на техническое обслуживание самолетов растут дальше, давая общую стоимость по крайней мере $700 миллионов на истребитель.


Статья полностью

Following the first flight of the Soviet Su-27 Flanker air superiority fighter in 1977, a platform designed to surpass the U.S. F-15 Eagle in air to air combat and ensure the Soviet Air Force would dominate the skies in a potential conflict with the Western Bloc, the United States Air Force urgently sought to commission a next generation fighter jet capable of outperforming the Flanker and ensuring parity or even supremacy could be retained. While testing of the Su-27 and the lighter MIG-29 were carried out in secret, U.S. intelligence were well aware of their presence by the early 1980s. The induction of the elite MiG-31 interceptor in 1981, a platform of which America's elite fighters remained highly weary, further strengthened calls for a more advanced American fighter capable of surpassing the Eagle and better contending with the new Soviet designs. The new fighter was to retain the speed and manoeuvrability of the F-15, but the Air Force further required the addition of next generation technologies, a stealth profile, a longer range, and, perhaps most crucially, lower maintenance requirements than the F-15.

With the F-22 Raptor's induction into service in December 2005, the aircraft was considered a great success - with an extremely low radar cross section and revolutionary new technologies integrated from its engines to its radar. The platform was only slightly slower than the Eagle, at Mach 2.25 rather than Mach 2.5, but was more manoeuvrable and retained the same air to air missile payload despite being required to store its munitions internally. Where the Raptor fell terribly short however was in its maintenance requirements - which not only failed to undercut those of the F-15 but were in fact far higher. This had two key consequences - the first being that the Raptor would cost a great deal to operate, over $60,000 per hour which made it the most expensive fighter to fly in the world by a considerable margin. The second was that the aircraft would be able to fly even less frequently than the already high maintenance Eagle, giving it a sortie rate of less than once long flight per week and thus seriously limiting its practical usefulness in a major war. While the Raptor was extremely sophisticated, and remains arguably the most advanced fighter in service anywhere in the world today, this came at a considerable cost - paid primarily not in acquiring or designing the fighter but rather in maintaining and flying it.

Maintenance would come to be the Achilles heel of the Raptor, not only in limiting the otherwise highly formidable fighter's combat potential but also in undermining the viability of the entire program. With the U.S. Air Force having initially planned to acquire 750 Raptors, the cost of maintaining so many fighters over their estimated 55 year lifespan would have been phenomenal. While the cost of an F-22 airframe is approximately $150, the cost of operating the fighter over a 40 year lifespan is approximately $550 - possibly much more as the jets age and maintenance costs rise further, giving a total cost of at least $700 million per fighter. While the U.S. military may well have been able to afford a Raptor fleet of approximately 350 fighters even after the Cold War's end had the aircraft had less extreme maintenance costs and requirements, the ongoing and ever increasingly costs of maintaining the fighter were likely key to the Obama administration prematurely terminating Raptor production at just 187 fighters - fulfilling just 25% of the Air Force's needs and cancelling entirely prospects for a carrier based variant to replace the F-14 or a strike variant under the FB-22 program to replace the F-15E Strike Eagle. Нad the F-22's maintenance requirements and costs been less extreme, or even below those of the already expensive F-15 Eagle as the Air Force had initially requested, these specialised variants would have been far more likely to have been pursued while the Air Force's prime air superiority fighter could well have entered service in twice the numbers of today. Ultimately the failure of the Raptor in this one key field undermined the otherwise highly successful program as a whole - though whether the F-22 would have been accepted into service with such a key shortcoming had the Soviet Union not disintegrated remains uncertain. It is highly likely however that, with a sixth generation air superiority fighter currently under development to replace the Raptor under the F-X Air Dominance Program, the U.S. Air Force will place a greater emphasis on lower maintenance requirements a higher sortie rate to ensure the program remains viable in the face of growing threats to American air superiority posed by new Russian and Chinese designs.


Авторство:
Авторская работа / переводика
Использованные источники:
http://militarywatchmagazine.com/article/70804


Комментарий автора:
Истребитель F-22 Raptor заехал в "сервис" / Техническое обслуживание
https://youtu.be/5Sbwog71Н_k
Пишут что раптору и ф35 такие ангары нужны после каждых двух полётов, потом ещё пару суток сохнуть....это паркетники не войны, в полях не не приземлится, температурный режим не нарушишь...

Сегодня-

Израиль предпочел старые самолеты F-15 более новым F-35
https://rg.ru/2018/08/01/izrail-pred...olee-novym-f-3 5.html

Военно-воздушные силы Израиля предпочитают старые самолеты F-15 Eagle более новым F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. А причина в потенциальном противнике Израиля - Иране. В борьбе с ним нужны дальние самолеты, способные брать на борт больше топлива и оружия.


Best regards, Boris

--- Ручка шариковая, цена 1.1.5-021027
Ответить с цитированием
Ответ


Ваши права в разделе
Вы не можете создавать новые темы
Вы не можете отвечать в темах
Вы не можете прикреплять вложения
Вы не можете редактировать свои сообщения

BB коды Вкл.
Смайлы Вкл.
[IMG] код Вкл.
HTML код Выкл.

Быстрый переход


Текущее время: 08:51. Часовой пояс GMT +4.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc. Перевод: zCarot