forum.wfido.ru  

Вернуться   forum.wfido.ru > Прочие эхи > RU.FIDONET.DIGEST

Ответ
 
Опции темы Опции просмотра
  #1  
Старый 11.09.2017, 19:30
Vladimir Fyodorov
Guest
 
Сообщений: n/a
По умолчанию REGCON.EUR: ERRFLAGS.ZC2

Vladimir Fyodorov написал(а) к All в Sep 17 18:13:50 по местному времени:


> В нод- и поинтлистах отныне появятся новые юзерские флаги для мобильных
> девайсов, использующих Aftershock (AFS), НotdogEd (НDG) и другие похожие
> программы (MOB).

=============================================================================
* Area : REGCON.EUR
* From : Ward Dossche, 2:292/854 (11 Сентября 2017 12:35)
* Subj : ERRFLAGS.ZC2
=============================================================================
A new version of ERRFLAGS.ZC2 has been released via file distribution.

Changes include dealing with the new userflags AFS, НDG and MOB.

For description and how to include, I refer to FIDONEWS of today.

Please share this information with NCs and Нubs.

\%/@rd Dossche
ZC2

===========================================================================
=================================================================
GENERAL ARTICLES
=================================================================

Mobile nodes
Ward Dossche
2:292/854

There are some beautiful software implementations which make it
possible to run a Fidonet node or point on an Android platform,
meaning you can even operate a node from certain smartphones. These
softwares are "Aftershock" and "НotdogEd".

I have now used "Aftershock" on my mobile point 2:292/854 for quite
some time in sometimes very rural conditions. It suited my purpose
perfectly and I am encouraging everyone to try it or НotdogEd in a
mobile environment.

It is fun, you can now operate a node or a point while on the road
without a bunch of other technical gizmos.

There have been a number of discussions about this -- are mobile nodes
real nodes or are they points? I decided that when it is clear that a
sysop is available to accept greater responsible for his or her
actions than a point, there is no reason why such a node cannot be
listed in the nodelist.

In the end a sysop is responsible for the actions of his or her users
and points and if such a mobile system is listed in the nodelist, it
provides a better control mechanism for the administrative tree.

So, as far as I'm concerned and we're dealing with mobile nodes
accepting the responsibility of a fully fledged sysop, I say "Welcome
to Fidonet".

To identify such mobile nodes, ERRFLAGS has been updated with the
addition of new user-flags in the Zone-2 segment, which eventually
could be elevated to full flag-status:

[,AFS] A mobile node running an Aftershock implementation on
Android

[,НDG] A mobile node running an НotdogEd implementation on Android

[,MOB] A mobile node running an undefined implementation on a
mobile device

Proposed listing of such nodes is:

,<node-nr>,<system name>,<location>,<sysop>,-Unpublished-,300,U,AFS
or
,<node-nr>,<system name>,<location>,<sysop>,-Unpublished-,300,U,НDG
or
,<node-nr>,<system name>,<location>,<sysop>,-Unpublished-,300,U,MOB

Ward Dossche ZC2
=============================================================================

--- GoldED+/OSX 1.1.5-b20170303
Ответить с цитированием
Ответ


Ваши права в разделе
Вы не можете создавать новые темы
Вы не можете отвечать в темах
Вы не можете прикреплять вложения
Вы не можете редактировать свои сообщения

BB коды Вкл.
Смайлы Вкл.
[IMG] код Вкл.
HTML код Выкл.

Быстрый переход


Текущее время: 16:30. Часовой пояс GMT +4.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc. Перевод: zCarot